Skip to Content

Article

MEP vs. AEC Collaboration: Bridging Communication Gaps

Author: Cecilia Beckerbauer

Editor: Aiden Bishop

Session Sponsored by: IMAGINiT

At the BIM Invitational Meetup, participants explored the persistent communication challenges between Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing (MEP) teams and the broader Architectural, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry. The discussions highlighted opportunities for collaboration, strategies to close knowledge gaps, and resources to improve workflows and team dynamics.


Communication Gaps Between MEP and AEC Teams

 A recurring theme in the discussion was the communication gap that often exists between MEP and AEC teams. Participants noted that differing priorities, terminologies, and workflows frequently lead to misunderstandings and inefficiencies during project execution.


“It’s not just about tools; it’s about speaking the same language,” one attendee observed, emphasizing the need for greater alignment in project goals and expectations. Miscommunication can result in rework, delays, and frustration, underscoring the critical need for better collaboration strategies.

Leveraging Knowledge Assessments

 To address these challenges, participants suggested leveraging knowledge assessments to identify learning opportunities and skill gaps within teams. By evaluating the technical and process knowledge of both MEP and AEC professionals, organizations can target specific areas for improvement and foster a culture of continuous learning.


Several attendees shared success stories of implementing training programs tailored to the unique needs of their teams. These programs not only enhanced individual capabilities but also improved overall project coordination and efficiency.

Insights from MEP Add-ins

Jason Peckovitch’s article in AUGI World on MEP add-ins was highlighted as a valuable resource for those seeking to improve collaboration through technology. Participants encouraged each other to explore these tools, which can enhance workflows and reduce friction between MEP and AEC disciplines.


Attendees noted that integrating the right add-ins can streamline processes, improve model accuracy, and enable teams to focus more on strategic problem-solving rather than manual tasks.

Next Steps for Improved Collaboration

The session concluded with a shared commitment to addressing the barriers that hinder effective MEP and AEC collaboration. Key takeaways included:

​• Encouraging Open Communication: Teams must prioritize transparency and ​   regular check-ins to ensure alignment throughout project phases.

​• Investing in Training: Knowledge assessments and tailored training programs           can empower teams to bridge technical and process-related gaps.

​• Exploring Technological Solutions: Tools like the MEP add-ins discussed in​            Jason’s article can play a crucial role in enhancing workflows and fostering ​            collaboration.

Reflections and Moving Forward

Participants agreed that while technology can facilitate better collaboration, the human element—communication, shared understanding, and mutual respect—remains paramount. The discussions at the BIM Invitational Meetup reinforced the importance of tackling these challenges head-on to create a more integrated and efficient AEC industry


As collaboration between MEP and AEC teams continues to evolve, resources like knowledge assessments and targeted tools will be invaluable in breaking down silos and fostering stronger partnerships. The BIM Invitational Meetup remains committed to providing a platform for these critical conversations, driving progress across the industry.